Dozens of women were seeking shelter in a childbirth facility in El Fasher, Sudan, when the massacre started. Among them were new mothers, while others were in the midst of labor.
Present at the hospital after dark, a 28-year-old lab technician, Abdo-Rabo Ahmed, managed to survive the ordeal. “The sounds of screaming reached me of women and children,” he recounts. “A massacre was taking place inside the hospital. Those who could run, fled.”
This horrifying event stands as among the worst examples in the ongoing war tearing the North African nation apart. Combatants forced their way into the building, reportedly killing more than 460 individuals receiving care and their families.
Rights organizations have labeled it “an unspeakable atrocity,” and a prime example of the vanishing safeguards for civilians living amidst warfare in several nations at war.
Despite every significant nation are signatories to the Geneva conventions, which obligate them to protect civilians, the past year has seen a record number of assaults against medical infrastructure. Expectant mothers are particularly at risk due to their need for locally available medical care.
An investigation of records uncover an alarming level of violence: nearly 300 violent acts against places and people associated with childbirth over the last three years, including at least 119 bombardments of hospitals and delivery wards.
“These are not inevitable outcomes of conflict. They represent a systematic assault on childbirth.”
The majority of these incidents have happened in regions embroiled in intense conflict, where countless of women bearing children are confined.
Mothers have lost their lives, denied medical attention, or compelled to deliver in deplorable situations. The data also indicates that at least 68 maternal health workers have been slain, 15 taken hostage, and 101 detained—sometimes during medical procedures.
Statistics are thought to be a substantial underreporting, as they are limited to incidents reported in news outlets. In many war-torn areas, communications are sparse.
Last year, analysis showed that one in two mothers who lost their lives in maternal circumstances lived amidst hostilities. This underscores a horrifying trend.
Beyond killing women and staff, these attacks are wrecking hospitals and wards, posing a long-term threat to societal repopulation and recovery.
In Gaza, the catastrophic impact on reproductive health rights has been cited by a UN commission as a factor in declaring certain actions a genocide.
Even after ceasefires, doctors report that women and children are still perishing from medical shortages, owing to critical shortages of medicine and equipment. UN officials have relayed women giving birth in rubble because hospitals could not be reached.
“Direct shelling targeting the wards, operating rooms, and maternity wards,” states the head of a major hospital’s gynecology department. A military spokesperson has rejected deliberately targeting maternity care or trying to alter birthrates.
Since early 2022, at least 80 hospitals for mothers and babies have been attacked and rendered unusable in Ukraine. Accounts from embattled medical centers describe births occurring in shelters and skyrocketing stress leading to problems during delivery.
“Russia is targeting us deliberately,” asserts the head of obstetrics at a repeatedly damaged hospital in Kherson. Russian authorities have denied deliberately targeting civilians.
“The reality is, every facility faces the threat of assault,” notes a medical director in Sumy. “If a drone is destroyed, the falling debris could impact a hospital.”
For the more than 676 million women living close to deadly warfare, there are few safeguards and rare trials for atrocities for those attacking childbirth services.
This absence of consequences has created a “culture of impunity,” says a human rights lawyer. “Attacks on reproductive healthcare, like coerced birth or involuntary sterilization, may constitute acts of genocide by preventing births.”
In El Fasher, the area lacked access to humanitarian aid long before the hospital attack, with malnutrition spiking dangerously, especially among children and pregnant women.
In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, information is restricted due to a communication blackout from rebel-held areas. Nevertheless, shelling in Goma struck a baby care unit, causing fatalities among patients and staff.
In Myanmar, medical facilities have been bombed and dozens of midwives and patients have been arrested, killed, or injured over the past two years of civil war.
The majority of childbirth fatalities are preventable with routine care, but war destroys healthcare networks. Rights groups note that fear is now driving women away from facilities once considered safe, resulting in risky home births devoid of emergency care.
“When childbirth centers become intentional targets indicates a broader and more sinister pattern: the use of attacks on medical facilities as a means of intimidation and to break societal cohesion,” says a legal researcher.
“Safeguards are not guaranteed for hospitals in war. Under the Geneva conventions, medical facilities are not inviolable if used for acts deemed ‘militarily advantageous’, which has increasingly been used as a justification.”
Lena is een ervaren casino-analist en schrijft al sinds 2015 over online gokken en spelstrategieën.